Specific performance is an appropriate remedy in contract disputes when what condition exists?

• A. Monetary damages are adequate
• B. The subject matter is unique and monetary damages are inadequate
• C. The contract is for services that can be replaced by money
• D. There is a minimal breach with easily quantifiable damages

Answer: (B)

Specific performance is an equitable remedy used when simply paying money won’t make the injured party whole. It’s appropriate when the subject matter of the contract is unique or irreplaceable and damages would be inadequate to compensate the loss. For example, real estate or a one-of-a-kind work of art can’t be replaced by money, so ordering the seller to convey the property or deliver the unique item makes sense. If the contract involves personal services, courts usually won’t force someone to perform, because that would be an ongoing compelled service. And if damages are easily quantified and adequate, monetary awards will be preferred over forcing performance. So the condition described—the subject matter is unique and monetary damages are inadequate—best justifies specific performance.