Under Article 31B, statements are admissible without custody when which condition is present?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $24.99Unlock all

Study for the CIDSAC Law Test. Engage with comprehensive flashcards and multiple choice questions, each featuring hints and detailed explanations. Prepare confidently for your upcoming exam!

Multiple Choice

Under Article 31B, statements are admissible without custody when which condition is present?

Explanation:
The key idea is a non-custodial exception to admissibility. Article 31B allows statements made to the police during interrogation to be admitted as evidence, but only when the person being questioned is not in police custody. In other words, the statement is admissible without custody if there is interrogation and the custody condition is not present. If custody is involved, this specific exception doesn’t apply. A warrant-supported search is unrelated to whether a statement during interrogation is admissible. So the best answer is the option that specifies both interrogation and a lack of custody.

The key idea is a non-custodial exception to admissibility. Article 31B allows statements made to the police during interrogation to be admitted as evidence, but only when the person being questioned is not in police custody. In other words, the statement is admissible without custody if there is interrogation and the custody condition is not present. If custody is involved, this specific exception doesn’t apply. A warrant-supported search is unrelated to whether a statement during interrogation is admissible. So the best answer is the option that specifies both interrogation and a lack of custody.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy